Mark3794

TMSC makes Sony sensors?

If i have to lug around a bag of camera lenses i'll just bring a camera with me

Probably just diffraction from the dust or small water droplets on the lens surface

FSI vs BSI is a small difference in performance, while going from 1/15 readout to 1/50 is going from unusable jello-world to usable images

Is it really old technology with a readout so fast?

This is also how you make a camera cost 1000$ more

Start with resetting camera settings and also try to clean the infrared sensor near the evf.

I didn't notice it was so big before

It reminds me of the 100$ Canon 75-300 from film era... I think this gallery needs to be reshot i don't believe this lens can be so bad.

Use one shot af for static subjects and try to turn IS off on a tripod.

I think it's a lot of money just to save a little bit of weight. Why not the RF 70-200 2.8 and the RF 100-400?

Because the R5 and R6 are still going strong against the competition. Don't fix what's not broken

Multiple exposure is disabled for the 14-35, probably has to do with the distortion correction of the lens

what's the sony body with 8k60p without overheating?

Or maybe cinema cameras just don't usually have ibis

"in-camera 5-axis digital stabilisation.” It's the digital video is.

I looked through the A7c evf and it's really bad, I've used $500 cameras that had a better one, looks like an analog TV trough a keyhole. Such a shame for a overall nice camera

I only see that a camera has more megapixels but less speed and onehas less megapixels but is faster. I don't see much leapfrogging

"We feel the a7 IV's 10 fps shooting is probably the strongest action mode here."

Completely forgets that the R6 has 12fps with mechanical shutter and 20 with electronic.

Sony APS-C looks more dead than Canon EF-M