misspiggy01

Already exists. You just don't know it.

Let's see some vision captured by this sensor. There has to be some, no?

Almost sounds too good to be true. But if it has solid 13 stops of DR it'll be ok.

Venice 2 has 13 stops, almost no RS...

for landscape and studio the RIV will do just fine. but the viewfinder is nice. bummer that res droppes when focussing. is that very annoying in actual use?

I actually love gold 200. Was impossible to get the last months where I live. I prefer it over ektar 100 for people.

I just bought a Nikon J2 for 35€. It shoots raw, has excellent af and I can change lenses. So no thanks Sony.

why? because it´s chinese? smart!

Great review. Thanks!

without academic research moderna could not have created a product.

it´s like the goal score of strikers is higher than of defenders. but a soccer team consist of one or two strikers only. why not...

Yeah Magnar! like MikeRan who knows that f1.4 is the only person that actuall needs a fast card in his A1.

The lengths that Sony apologists go...

How about buffer clearing time? What is the point of slowing down a fast camera with slow cards?

Let's see.

Second A1 body plus lens vs CFA card. Hmm TOUGH decision.

they could make a 600$ apsc camera to go with their 1200$ CFE card.

Cool story Cax.

well, i like the vintage look!

Nice look.

Would have been worth mentioning that the G2 LCD is 500 nits compared to the 1500nit of the 6K PRO. For outdoor shooting you need the viewfinder or a bright external monitor.
For me that's more...

Seems you forgot the word 'not' in your headline.

There are 36 million microlensing events in my camera at 3,5fps. Take that hubble!
;)

Nice.

seriously, how could you have missed that you are sooo out of focus? rely on af? bad punch in?