-
You guys are forgetting that the OIS adds cost! This lens costs $1 more than the Sony!
-
The Sony costs $1 less? That’s it, I’m ditching Canon!
-
You’re only into photography one year, so you do not have the training or skills of a professional. I could put the world’s best guitar in your hands, but you will not be ready to play with The ...
-
I hate the name. Great if you’re into meditation, I suppose, but I hate to eee them take away the Olympus name.
-
Peak shutter speed? Maybe only 1/125?
-
I haven’t, but I have a 70-200 EF and it is a wonderful lens. When I use it when the Canon 1.4x extender, it’s noticeably softer. I don’t think image quality with the 1.4 is better than if I just ...
-
I don’t shoot Leicas, but I am very happy to see them surviving in this hyper competitive age. I’d far rather see them create these playthings of the 1% than put their name on some cheap Chinese...
-
I believe you; there’s really no need for a test, except to see how much the rod “bends” in electronic shutter mode. I wonder if that’s a problem for nature photography? Truly, I don’t know. ...
-
John, I don’t really know what’s going on inside the camera, but on all my Canon DSLR’s, peak burst rage was very much variable. For instance, the state of battery charge and focus acquisition ...
-
John, he’s right that a lot of Canon cameras don’t have a predictable frame rate cadence, your tests notwithstanding.
-
Yeah, but where are you going to display that? broadcast TV? No cinema? No YouTube? No There are some TV’s and displays now which can receive 120 fps, so for special purposes you could do it but ...
-
How does that help anyone?
-
Yes, what you’re saying is true for long-range shooting where you’ll crop anyway. However… with the crop sensor camera you’ll have a more difficult framing challenge. It’s not as if you can ...
-
I have an R5, but the R6 has some advantages. Mainly, with half the file size, all your post processing is much faster. Some people say the R6 performs better than R5 in low light, although I ...
-
I don’t think that’s entirely fair. These cameras have exponentially more computerized complexity. Indeed, the features which were little changed from earlier versions were big free; it’s the new ...
-
We have to answer the question with integrity. If you only want to share your photos online, if you don’t want post processing, if telephoto performance doesn’t matter… the iPhone is a very ...
-
I agree. Motion in video is intended to be blurry. That’s the thing. The D-Day scene in Saving Private Ryan was shot with a fast shutter, and you can see the staccato-like motion. I don’t fault ...
-
Show me your concert photos.
-
No, he did not ask that. He asked “outperform.” If you compare output of the two cameras for the purposes of photos shared to Facebook, the iPhone will win in some cases.
-
Everything is relative. If you’re both taking a snapshot and posting it immediately to Facebook, the iphone 14 will often give better results. It has very advanced, automatic post-processing and ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
8200 |
Threads started |
133 |
Last post |
22 hours ago |
Total reviews |
2 |
Last review |
Jun 21, 2018 |
Entries |
5 |
Votes cast |
0 |
Last entry |
Oct 13, 2017 |
Photos uploaded |
51 |
Last upload |
4 months ago |
|