Malling

Predators

Sony first 70-200 where launched at exactly the same price at that time Canon and Nikon 70-200 lens, so I don’t know where you get that impression from. The same was the case with the...

Don’t exist for RF because of Canon threatening by lawsuits

Myles doesn’t really help OP when OP live in Australia…

For large part of the world this lens is 120-150% compared to the Sony version. We all know people look at pricing on competing system when...

Most users probably don’t buy L lenses, the overwhelming numbers are those who buy the 1.8 in the 24-85 range and 2.8 sub 24 and 100-200mm range, why you also seen Nikon taking care of that first....

PL

The Sony is also optical excellent for it ‘s price and so is Canon, also we had this discussion before, it’s not the focus breathing that dictate the seize of a lens, you can make very small...

TRU funny enough I have several time also criticising Sony for going the Canon route on the bodies.

But largely we can thank Canon for the overcharged pricing, as it was Canon who really started...

Dmantree it’s going to be one big heavy system that dos AF poorer then the Sony if you only get adapted lenses.

I always say to people ignore the bodies but look at the lenses, can you get the...

Nikon and Canon are definitely doing their very best to convince me to stay at Sony… Sony don’t even have to offer products I want.

Canon new lens smack on additional €1000 over Sony version ...

No this is just Canon being Canon, let’s not make up excuses for them.

Sony GM primes are generally around the price of the 135mm, most are in fact a tiny bit cheaper the only normal range prime...

Mikael I can get the Sony with 19-25% VAT under €2000, the Canon with VAT is €2700-2900 grotesquely overpriced.

In Europe the Sony cost a €1000 less 😂

Melgrose depends on where you live in Europe it’s like €2700-2900 so above a €1000 more then the Sony

Pnad it matters in panning but then that actually requires a panning mode on the lens, this is just an on/off so it’s probably 1:1 with newest sony IBIS.

Not really an advantage unless your xenophobic

It’s utterly irrelevant where lenses are made these days it’s been proved time after time.

My problem is that marketing something “special” when there really isn’t anything special about black, it’s the most standard colour in the industry. Just add the colour etc. and stop making a fuss...

Then you call it mkii or v.ii like everyone else

What Nikon do deserves to be ridiculed, normally you just add colour selection to a product if you intend to offer that as a choice, calling it a special edition is just ridiculous especially when...

Can you please tell me what’s special about a black lens, perhaps it’s just me but what is it that makes it of special interest?

How many pro do you see shooting with a Z50 in emperors new clothes

Who cares it’s a special edition